Birender and Others (2020) 11 SCC 356, this Court considered in the facts before it as to whether the major sons of the deceased who ...

SHATRUGHN YADAV Vs THE FERTILIZERS AND CHEMICALS TRAVANCORE LTD. (F.A.C.T.) AND OTHERS 36. The appeal is allowed in the aforesaid terms.

1. The syndicate, not the individual, is the unit of analysis.

Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited Vs. Rekha and Ors.

The call detail records further amplify the incriminating previous conduct of A1 on the date of incident. The records reveal that A1 was in constant touch with A2, A3 and A5 before the incident.

In our considered opinion, the aforesaid discrepancy was wholly inconsequential and incapable of dislodging the presumption attaching to a registered conveyance executed nearly four decades earlier.

iv. Mobile numbers relied upon by the prosecution were not in the name of the accused persons and the Court has erred in convicting the appellants on mere suspicion; v. Mere mobile locations cannot be ...

Expert legal help, exam prep, & top court judgments. Trusted by judges, lawyers, & students.

12.1 An Appellate Court has a statutory duty to deal with an Application for Additional Evidence on its merits. The application cannot be ignored while the Court proceeds to pronounce the final ...

28. Learned District Judge has rightly observed that the responsibility to maintain the child, is an independent right of the father and it cannot be claimed to be adjusted against the amount of Rs. 8 ...

(b) The impugned Judgment and Order dated 01.01.2025 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Solapur below Exhibit-23 in RCC No. 1235 of 2018 and the Order dated 23.07.2025 in Criminal Revision ...

“25. We are of the firm opinion that mere admission of a document in evidence does not amount to its proof. In other words, mere marking of exhibit on a document does not dispense with its proof, ...