Oct 23, 2012 · It says A* is faster than using dijkstra and uses best-first-search to speed things up. A* is basically an informed variation of Dijkstra. A* is considered a "best first search" …

Apr 7, 2014 · Your code is really confusing: there are 2 different variables named G, unused variable S, and so on. I guess your code just finds ways with no more than 2 edges, as you …

76 After a lot of Googling, I've found that most sources say that the Dijkstra algorithm is "more efficient" than the Bellman-Ford algorithm. But under what circumstances is the Bellman-Ford …

Jun 27, 2016 · As per my understanding, I have calculated time complexity of Dijkstra Algorithm as big-O notation using adjacency list given below. It didn't come out as it was supposed to …

Aug 26, 2009 · Dijkstra's algorithm is definitely complete and optimal that you will always find the shortest path. However it tends to take longer since it is used mainly to detect multiple goal …

I was reading about worst case time complexity for the Dijkstra algorithm using binary heap (the graph being represented as adjacency list). According to Wikipedia and various stackoverflow …

Mar 14, 2017 · A: Dijkstra's Algorithm at every step greedily selects the next edge that is closest to some source vertex s. It does this until s is connected to every other vertex in the graph. …

Apr 21, 2017 · Therefore, dijkstra has the advantage over A* which is that it works for any general graph (with the exception of A* being faster in some cases). It could well be that certain …

Mar 29, 2022 · Below is my implementation for Dijkstra's algorithm using heaps (for undirected graphs). This works just fine for reasonably sized graphs however I am not satisfied by my …

Dijkstra's algorithm runs on positive weighed graphs, otherwise the priority queue would be useless. In your example, Dijkstra's algorithm would work because the graph is both weighed …